TURMOIL, TRANSFORMATIONS, AND TRANSITION Nigeria in a World in Crisis; Problems and Prospects*

INTRODUCTION
I wish to start by expressing my pleasure at the continued commitment of Social Action to organising camps such as these for young women and men, many of whom have become activists only in recent times. These started in 2008 and have become interlaced with a network of study centres in Benin, Port Harcourt and Calabar. And over the cause of these past few years, I have noticed significant developments in the arguments and politics of many a youth associated with this process. For this, I do commend Social Action.

We face two interrelated problems at the historic point where we now stand. On one hand, after decades of economic, political and ideological attacks by the bosses on the working people, has resulted in a “poverty of philosophy” indeed a drought of living revolutionary alternatives (in terms of both ideas and organisation) for young activists coming into political life. On the other hand, we are living through the most earth-shaking crisis of the capitalist system in almost a century. It does not only end there, this multi-layered crisis is not going away soon. Resistance and revolts have shaken several countries in the advanced capitalist world, the so-called “developing” countries and the so-called Newly Industrialised; in short, we are witnessing a global uprising. And it is one that is obviously going to be long drawn.

Mass anger in this era of crises and revolts has not only been manifested on the streets. Demonstrations and riots have been intertwined with waves of strikes almost everywhere. Elections have also seen quite a sizeable number of traditionally dominant liberal parties (of both the right and the left) booted out at the polls. Although the main beneficiaries of these, particularly in Europe, have been left reformist parties, far right (fascist and ultra-nationalist) forces have also made significant inroads, reflecting the desperation and confusion that also go with periods of turmoil.

The foregoing broad picture brings me to the thrust of this paper. I was asked to speak on “Nigeria in the face of global economic and political transition”. I think this is in essence a robust topic. I have chosen to re-phrase it though, because I am of the opinion that we are living through a tumultuous period, which would most likely result in some social-political and economic transitions in what seems to me a pre-transition period.

Defining periods or moments of history is very important, not only for us to understand the past, but also and more importantly to guide our strategy in the struggle for a better future. For example, the unquestioned conviction of revolutionary socialists organised around the Fourth International at the end of World War II that an epoch of transition (to socialism) had commenced, led to futile attempts at bending reality to fit into an ossified (element of their) theory. This of course had dire consequences for their politics.

History is driven by the class struggle, between the haves and the have-nots, the bosses and the bossed, the rich and the poor, the capitalists and the working class. This struggle is waged in the realms of; economics, politics and theory/ideology. The 1970s-90s witnessed sharp ascendancy of the bosses globally. Neoliberal globalisation which was (and still is) the dominant ideology of the capitalists became ingrained as the “conventional wisdom”.

The “Battle of Seattle” in November 1999 marked a turning point of sorts. The upheavals we have and continue to witness in the wake of the “Great Recession” constitute an entreport into a new phase of struggle for the soul of humankind. Further “approximations” of what we, the people essentially want, would be critical to such entre port becoming the gateway to a period of transition.

This paper thus looks at the following: the characteristics of the current tumultuous times; what transformations within the subsisting capitalist social formation have and could amount to; the problems and prospects of social-economic and political transition in general and; the specificities of these general trends within the concrete realities of Nigeria.

The foregoing haven been said, I must stress that this is basically a draft. When I got the topic last week, I was enamoured by it. I cannot think of any revolutionary that would not consider the issues it seeks to address as being the central questions for us in the current period. I am humbled by the fact that the paper is meant to serve as template for the four-day period of robust discussions which I have known the Social Action camps for. But, I was already in a bind of deadlines for both practical and theoretical tasks, and cannot write as extensively as I would have wanted to on the matter at hand, immediately. I do hope that in our discussions, a lot of what might have been left out would be filled in and would equally enrich the final paper.
A WORLD IN TURMOIL; NIGERIA IN CRISIS
When the global economic crisis started in 2007, few persons thought it could become so deep and last so long. Indeed, in its early stage it was first presented as a “credit crunch”, and not wholly even yet a financial crisis, in the United States and some countries in Europe. By 2008, it was obvious that it was more than just credit that was in trouble. We then had the narrative of a financial crisis.

Before the collapse of Lehman Brothers on September 15, 2008 (and even after that time, for a while for some), it was seen as problem distinct from the economy as a whole, and thus there was no economic crisis. But at the end of it all, it was clear that a Great Recession had set in, and it was global.

I do not intend to go into the “whys” and dynamics of the current global economic crisis. I have made an effort in that direction with my book last year[1]. Further, it is obvious to even the most dumb witted of politicians and the most placid of activists that there is such a global crisis. There are basically four things that I would want to stress here.

First, we have a multi-layered crisis. That is to say we have a complex of several crises which are not only interrelated, but are interwoven into one seething organic crisis. An organic crisis is a systemic or put in other words, structural crisis. It calls into question, not just this or that aspect of a social formation, but the entirety of such society as a system.

Some of the key facets of this structural crisis of the capitalist system are: economic; political; ideological; environmental and; inter-national.

Second, while we have a multi-layered and yet singular crisis, we single out the economic crisis as primary. This does not mean that there is a mechanistic relationship between the economy and other spheres of social life.

On the contrary, the different spheres of society’s super-structure acquire their own dynamics, in a sense. But economic existence and relations are and remains the base of social life, for it is the sphere of the production and reproduction of our material existence. And of course, it goes without saying that “existence precedes consciousness”.

Third, the current crisis did not just come out of the blues, or simply happen because a few bankers were greedy, or even just because of the liberalised space for financial transactions. The capitalist system is inherently crisis prone, with cycles of prosperity (which the bosses are the main beneficiaries of) and bursts (which the working people are made to bear as much of the brunt of, as the bosses can make them do).

The financial sector tends to play a trigger role for such crises of capitalism. This is not something that is associated with only the recent period of neoliberalism. Capitalists need credit to expand production, and thus accumulate more capital. But quite importantly, the tail of finance appears to wag the dog of capital, as greater turnover of interest could be secured through financialisation and its related speculation.

But financialisation has been a trigger, and not the cause of the crises of capitalism in its seeming eternal cycles of booms and slumps. The roots of these crises lie in the tendency for the rate of profit to fall. And a major factor why the current crisis is turning out to be a “Great Stagnation”, is precisely because of the ever more increasingly difficult room for manoeuvre by the bosses to maintain profitability.

Fourth, the crisis is global, but it is multi-layered not only in this sense. It is also multi-layered in its interface with the uneven and combined nature of capitalist development as a whole. In simply terms, the specific ways and manners it has manifested in different regions and countries stem from the historically established peculiarities of these regions and countries. In a broad sense, once could here talk of the different “modalities of the capitalist mode of production”, as Gilbert Achcar puts it.

This brings us to Nigeria in crisis, in relation to the universal structural crisis. We can remember that when the global economic crisis started, the then Governor of the Central Bank of Nigeria, Charles Soludo claimed that it would not affect the country. But within three months in 2009, one third of the shares of banks and financial institutions had become mere toilet paper. And not surprisingly, we have seen the poverty rate increase from 54% to 70% from the pre-crisis period of 2006 to 2010.

The economic crisis of Nigeria has interlocked with other masks of class struggle, particularly the ethnic and religious. It is hardly accidental that the rise of Boko Haram insurgency for example coincides with the period of the “Great Contraction” of global capitalism.
The situation in Nigeria now is so dire that even members of the elite can clearly see a revolution in the horizon. Earlier in March this year, Chief Olusegun Obasanjo, a former Head of State noted that the shocking rate of youth unemployment (which is about half of the entire population of youths seeking employment according to official figures) is a recipe for revolution. Similarly, Aminu Tambuwal, the Speaker of the House, stated two weeks ago that the present state of disillusionment and mass discontent could very well lead to a revolution in the unfolding period.

The experience of the January Uprising is a pointer to the possibilities of revolt. It is however also a pointer to the weaknesses of forces representing revolutionary-transformative alternative to the bosses and their system. But this problem which is ideological, political and organisational is itself immersed in the process of attacks on one hand and incorporation on the other hand that have been characteristic of the neoliberal period that we are yet to break out of.

We thus find looming turmoil and with it, a serious dilemma. But implicit in this is the reality of how popular revolutions do unfold i.e. through a series of approximation by the working masses in the theatre of struggle, as different contending and collaborating groups and social movements take to the trenches, with and within the disposed people.

BETWEEN TRANSFORMATION AND TRANSITION
There is obviously a relationship between crises and the re-ordering of society within and beyond particular systems or social formations, particularly in the modern era. Economic and political transitions in the strict sense of the word are long drawn historical periods of social revolution spanning decades, and in some cases centuries. Indeed, the earliest of such transitions i.e. to stable agrarian societies (the Neolithic revolution) lasted a few millennia!

Put in other words, “transitions” are essentially the supersession of an obsolete mode of production by a more progressive one, which emerges in its womb. As higher modes of productions are attained, they become more universalized and also tend to have shorter periods of the social revolutions that vanquish them.

For example, while the Neolithic revolution took millenniums, the “dark ages” in which the slave-owning Greco-Roman era was superseded by feudalism took like half a millennia and within a few centuries, capitalism vanquished feudalism.

This might make it tempting for us to consider what is happening before us now as a (beginning of) transition to socialism. There is however something peculiar about this particular transition. Earlier social revolutions had mobilised the masses around a rising elite which proclaimed its interests as their interests. In short, they had and could not but have dripped from head to toe in lies.

But the act of the working class emancipation, which is both the pathway and precondition for socialism cannot but be an act of self-emancipation. Socialism cannot be established for the working masses. It has to be aware of its historic mission. Socialist consciousness is not something that happens after the socialist revolution; it is at the heart of the workers’ class consciousness.

Does this mean that every single worker has to have such class consciousness for such transitional revolution to be won? Absolutely not! But a critical mass of the working people has to be won to the cause of struggle for socialist revolution, through practice. It is this that constitutes the vanguard and not some party. The revolutionary party is a party of the vanguard movement of the working class. Such party and such vanguard movement as at now does not exist anywhere.

This is the challenge of the subjective factor in world where the objective factors are overly ripe. We are faced with the task of forging the pre-conditions for overcoming this challenge, in Nigeria and internationally.

Economic and political transitions are (series of) transformation, which bridge different social formations. There are however transformations within a particular (and more specifically, the capitalist) social formation. These mark fundamental restructuring of the system with the intent of avoiding its collapse, in the face of severe organic crisis.

Dumenil and Levy for example point out three phases of capitalist development marked by such transformations as being: the belle époque after the “Long Depression” of the 1890s; the so-called “Keynesian National Welfare State”/”social-democratic compromise”/Fordist mode of regulation, after the “Great Depression” of the 1930s and; the post-Fordist/neo-liberal globalization paradigm, after the mid-1970s crisis.
We might be in such a moment where transformation in some form or the other would be on the order of the day. It is however important to note that such transformations are shaped by the inter-play of both popular and passive revolutions, with the later being considered necessary to use in forging a “class compromise” (as with Keynesianism) only where and when the ruling class feels threatened enough to thus give in.

The dilemma of the present moment is that, on one hand the working class which is most strategically placed to give the bosses much more than scares is, no thanks to its unions, in the bind of “pluralist” illusions despite its consistently demonstrated discontent. On the other hand though, as we stated earlier, this is one crisis that is not going away very soon. The process of “approximations” as Leon Trotsky put it is thus more likely to spread...as we are seeing it happen in Egypt.

We have looked thus far at the issues of transformation and transition in a broad, general sense. How does this relate to the situation in Nigeria?

Capitalist development in Nigeria, as with other places in Africa was still at its infancy stage during the “stark utopia” of “the Great Transformation”, as Karl Polanyi put it. While capitalism had taken roots at the time of the post-War transformation, colonial fetters held it down from instituting a “developmentalist” class compromise, as opined by Toyin Falola.

The 1960s was the decade of African states’ Independence. Barely a decade from that, the neoliberal counter-revolution was enthroned. These had very adverse consequences for the trajectory of our development in several ways.

We now have a self-serving class of elites, who are some of the most parasitic in the world. Neo-patrimony and “prebendalism” have become strategies for both primitive accumulation-in-perpetuity and incorporatism as well. But the masks of ethno-religious manipulation melt somewhat in the heat of crisis as we now see.

But, while left reformism sweeps across Europe, resting on decades of social-democratic politics turned social-liberalist, the visible “alternatives” on the terrain of political contestation are no better than six to half a dozen.

In this light, I must primarily point at the new mega-party of the bosses i.e. the All Progressives Congress. Several activists and citizens in general have developed illusions in it. Such activists have even constituted themselves as the “progressive front” within this supposed coming together of “all progressives”. Such illusion for some is an extension of a two-stage approach to revolutionary struggle.

Another pathway seems to be in the minds of other activists. This is the formation of socialist parties. Any effort at organising should be welcomed. Practice of course, is the sole criterion for truth. But it is my candid opinion that massifying alternative politics does not equate to attaching the nomenclature of “party”. And based on the 1999 constitution, it could even be counter-productive. The challenge irrespective of nomenclature is being on the ground as the Revolutionary Socialists in Egypt were before January 25, 2011. 

It is mass movements and through these, ultimately in these period; political revolutions, that can bring about reformative transformation in the country. In the final analysis, the triumph of more thorough going revolutionary change in Nigeria is bound to the international victory of the working class over the bosses.

CONCLUSION
This paper has been a summary attempt to present a broad picture of the current situation in Nigeria and globally, with the intent of grasping a sense of the prospects and problems of revolutionary transformation.

It bears in its heart, the maxim from Gramsci that revolutionaries must be armed with “optimism of the will and pessimism of the intellect”. In this direction, it aims at identifying the revolutionary pathway forward without promoting movementism or a false sense of movement.

In summing up, I will paraphrase Karl Marx that human beings make history, not based on terms that they invoke from the minds, but based on the concrete reality that is the context of their struggle and which they intend to change and in changing bring an end to the exploitation and oppression of humans by humans.

Thank you for listening.   

* Being a paper presented on Wednesday, July 24, 2013 at the Social Action Anti-Imperialist Camp for young activists, held on July 23-27, 2013, at De-Wis College, 5 Asuquo Inyang Str., Off Abitu Avenue, Anantigha, Calabar.

  



[1] Era of Crises and Revolts, 2012, Solaf Publishers, Ibadan

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Trade unionism and trades unions; an introductory perspective

On neoliberal globalization 1

Tools and skills for trade unions’ engagement with the state’s policy cycle process