“#I am not Charlie”
Almost
4million people marched in more than 200 cities and towns across France on
Sunday 11. This “unity rally” was a response to the recent killing of 20
persons in Paris. 41 heads of states including Francois Hollande of France,
Angela Merkel of Germany, Ibrahim Boubacar Keita of Mali, David Cameron of
Britain, Mahmoud Abbass of Palestine and Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel led a
multitude of 1.6 people from the Place de la République to the Place de la Nation
in Paris. Demonstrations also took place in several cities like London,
Montreal, Madrid, Brussels and Berlin.
The
initial call for mass demonstrations was made by the trade unions. The French
state latched onto it with the aim of appropriating the mood of anguish and
defiance from below for “national unity”. “I am Charlie” and “liberte!” were
popular slogans expressing this defiance against the despicable murder of the Charlie Hebdo magazine’s editorial board
members, in the manifestations across France. One cannot but condemn the
killings and attacks on free speech, as an activist. There are important issues
that we must however not lose sight of, and for which I must boldly say I am not Charlie.
The
magazine’s satire over the last four decades has targeted several political and
religious institutions and personages. Some of these were progressive, talking
truth to power. But in a context where Moslems are stereotyped as terrorists
irrespective of their political leanings, Charlie’s
caricature of Moslems was not just an expression of free speech. It helped
to deepen racist ideology, as most French Moslems are dark skinned immigrants,
mainly from former French colonies like Algeria and Tunisia.
They
face greater poverty and are more likely to run afoul of the law, just like
blacks in the United States. Thus, as the Washington
Post pointed out seven years ago, while Moslems make up less than 10% of
the population, almost 70% of prison inmates are Moslems. And this is just a
tip of the iceberg. They are more likely to face: ethnic profiling;
discrimination in securing housing; police brutality, and; physical assaults
than other citizens who are white Christians or free thinkers.
This
dire situation they face is enough to breed hostility against the system. And
the imperialist wars of Western countries like France help direct this anger
into the channels of recruitment by militant Islamist sects. For example, one
of the Kouachi brothers who carried out the Charlie
Hebdo killings was radicalised by the dehumanizing torture of Iraqi
prisoners in Abu Ghraib by American soldiers, shown on television.
However,
misguided terror tactics only play into the hands of the bosses. They will
always try to use such painful tragedies to present a false picture that “we
are one” bound by the fight against terror. George Bush played up these
sentiments after 9/11 and Goodluck Jonathan “is doing it”.
But
the world leaders’ lamentations are merely crocodile tears. Most of the heads
of states that marched, supposedly for free speech and against terrorism “harass,
detain and torture journalists”, according to CNN. They hide behind the veil of
official secrecy when it suits them. Julian Assange and Edward Snowden remain
on the wanted list of USA because they democratised free speech!
We
must not allow ourselves to be divided by the condemnable acts of terror of a
few, on the basis of any ideology. When the rightwing Anders Behring Breivik
killed 77 fellow Norwegians on July 22, 2011, it was not considered as attacks
by a Christian. The activities of Jihadists
do not represent what Moslems or migrants stand for. Working class
activists must stand up against such stereotyping.
This
is of the utmost importance at this moment. Within two days after the first of
the Paris killings; grenades were thrown at a mosque in Le Man; a restaurant
associated with a mosque was bombed at Villefranche-sur-Saone; gunshots were
fired at another mosque in Port-la-Nouvelle, and; a pig’s head and innards were
placed at the front of an Islamic centre in Corsica with a note which read
“next time it will be one of your heads”.
This
evil wind that does working people no good is not blowing only in France. In
the German city of Dresden, a reactionary group called the Patriotic Europeans
Against the Islamization of the West (PEGIDA), formed by one Lutz Bachmann, a
hardened criminal, has been organising mass demonstrations every Monday since
October 20, 2014 calling for limits to immigration, particularly of Moslems. It has been growing, with similar
platforms being established in other German cities like Leipzig, Darmstadt and
Bonn. PEGIDA and its like are hammering on the Paris attacks to justify their
racist demands. But, huge anti-PEGIDA demonstrations are also taking place,
insisting that “people are just people”.
In
France as well, trade unionists and socialist activists, many of who
participated in the January 11 manifestations marched under banners of
plurality i.e. against demonising Moslems, Islam or immigrants in general. They
received resounding support. They will have to argue out the relationship
between France’s imperialist intervention and the growth of “home-grown
terrorism”. More importantly, in the impending battles that lie ahead, which
could dwarf the mass strikes of 2010, all working people irrespective of race,
nationality or ethnicity will have to stand together to defeat the bosses.
In
the coming period, governments and rightwing movements will continue to use the
excuse of seemingly senseless terror by militants to substantiate racist and
anti-immigrant demands. Working people must stand firm against such divisive
tactics. The bosses, their capitalist system and the wars they fight to defend
their interests are at the root of both the economic crisis and terrorism. We
must unite in struggle to bring this exploitative system to an end. Our battle
cry must be we are human and thus deserve
freedom, from want and from wars.
Comments
I also posted onto facebook commentary by Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who is sometimes accused of being an apologist for imperialism and a neo-liberal agenda.
My sense is that your commentary and Ali's commentary are complementary and are not in opposition, if they are interpreted with sufficient discernment.
Ali wants the Charlie Hebdo cartoons to be reprinted all over the place, just as a defiant act of free speech.
However, as you mentioned, some of the cartoons were in poor taste and caricaturized Moslems and Muhammad rather than helped to educate through humor.
So I disagree with Ali about reprinting offensive cartoons, but I agree that free speech must be protected. This is a nuanced position, not easily understood by persons in an emotional state of mind.